Regular readers of Thoughtsport will know we’re not fans of goal line technology. We realise this places us in rather the minority. Here’s a mere snippet of those arguing for, just from a quick blog search:
Sepp says ‘enough is enough’ – Sporting Interests
Robbie Fowler: FIFA must end this goal-line farce – Paddy Power Betting Blog
England 1 – 0 Ukraine. Co-hosts sent home as demands for goal line technology get another boost – Full-Time Whistle
We won’t go over our old arguments that football is a great leveler. Tall or short, heavy or light with the right application, skill and determination you can be a footballer. If you play down the park on a Sunday you could (in theory) play with Lionel Messi, Pele or whoever the heck you want because you’d be playing the same game.
Same rules; same pitch dimensions; same ball — it’d be the same. Introduce goal-line technology and suddenly the pros are playing a different game.
No, we won’t go over that again (you can read our old blog if you want to).
Last night’s England game against Ukraine, which reignited the goal line technology debate, didn’t alter ThoughtSport’s position one bit.
Watch the ‘goal’ yourself on the BBC website: The ‘goal’ that wasn’t: Ukraine denied equaliser
All the media talk this morning has been about Sepp Blatter, Fifa, Uefa, HawkEye, assistant-assistant refs (what do they do anyway?) — there’s even the age old “these things even themselves out in the end” with much smirking about Frank Lampard’s goal that never was against Germany in the last World Cup.
They are all missing the point.
Watch the ‘goal’ again — notice anything? Probably not as the Beeb are glossing over the same key point too. Even their tabloid-esque headline (beneath you BBC) ‘The ‘goal’ that wasn’t: Ukraine denied equaliser’ tells you they’ve made up their mind already. Why let a few facts get in the way of a good story; especially one which means they can beat the goal line technology drum again.
It wasn’t a goal. Or at least it shouldn’t have been. Artem Milevskiy, the first Ukraine player to touch the ball in the BBC clip, was offside.
You remember offside? The rule that says you must at least be level with the last defender when the pass is made? Yes, there are ‘interfering with play’ rules and caveats, but this fella, Milevskiy, receives the pass directly so no ‘interfering’ rules need interfere.
Why is it that one official’s mistake (the assistant referee who should have spotted the offside) is irrelevant when another’s (the extra assistant who didn’t spot that the ball had crossed the line) is deemed all important? So important we need to exhort Fifa to sort this mess out?
There’s the rub with goal line technology. It’s too black and white. The question the technology is asked is: Did the ball cross the line? There are only two answers: Yes or no. The system Fifa are supposedly trialling will alert the referee, via an audible beep in an earpiece, that the ball crossed the line.
Technology would not tell him if the player handled it over the line; it would not tell him if the player was offside when he ‘scored’; it would not tell him if he had in fact fouled the defender/goalkeeper to reach the ball and ‘score’ — all of those things would be down to human judgement.
Dear old human judgement. It’s what makes football the game we love. Will the winger try to go one way or the other? Will he have a shot himself or try and pass? Will he lunge in now or try and force him wide? Decisions that are made thousands of times in every game which make every game different.
Mistakes (interspersed with brilliance) are what makes football great — whether they’re mistakes by players or officials.
If those who advocate goal line technology think it will solve all such problems they need to think again. What will the media broo-haha be if England concede a goal which is ‘allowed’ by goal-line technology but is punched over the line Maradonna style?
Think the sequence of events that would lead to that is all together unlikely? Perhaps you should read our old blog post after all… if you’re Irish you probably won’t need to.